Viewing abuse filter 7: Large deletion from article by new editors

Filter parameters

Filter ID:	7
Description: (publicly viewable)
Conditions:	edit_delta < -5000 & new_size >= 50 & page_namespace == 0 & !("confirmed" in user_groups) & length(summary) < 60 & !(user_name in page_recent_contributors) & !("#redirect" in lcase(added_lines)) & !(summary irlike "\bcop(y\|ied)\|und(id\|o)\|\brv[vt]?\b\|revert\|vandal\|remov\|clean\|delet\|\brmv?\b\|\brepea?t") & rcount("\n[\|!<]",removed_lines) / (rcount("\n",removed_lines) + 1) < 0.9 & length(rmwhitespace(added_lines)) < 3000 edit_delta < -5000 & new_size >= 50 & page_namespace == 0 & !("confirmed" in user_groups) & length(summary) < 60 & !(user_name in page_recent_contributors) & !("#redirect" in lcase(added_lines)) & !(summary irlike "\bcop(y\|ied)\|und(id\|o)\|\brv[vt]?\b\|revert\|vandal\|remov\|clean\|delet\|\brmv?\b\|\brepea?t") & rcount("\n[\|!<]",removed_lines) / (rcount("\n",removed_lines) + 1) < 0.9 & length(rmwhitespace(added_lines)) < 3000
Notes:	Original from Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseFilter/30) fixing the part about recent contributor.. <nixeagle> No, that was the intended logic, to test whether the user is The Only contributor. Putting that back. Deleting from a page you created should be fine, but blanking from an established page just because you edited it previously generally would not be. - Dragons_flight Restoring Prodego's edit. - DF Thanks for the talk page note DF / Don't trip if it is a full blank, overlaps with filter 3 -Prodego Changed from "new editor" to "non-autoconfirmed editor" for clarity. -xeno optimizing - Hersfold I increased the threshold to -2000 to decrease the number of hits - Ruslik0 Fixing the recent contributors thing; this is a string of up to ten users, so != doesn't work. - hersfold exception for 69.226.103.13 - Cen NO! Do not exempt particular IPs, its a waste of checks. If they want exemption, they can create an account. Its free -Prodego Increased threshold to 5000. - Ruslik Closed gap between filter 3 and filter 30 - previously could reduce articles to exactly 50 without triggering. RF Added action check, so it'll stop pinging on AFT comments. - rsterbin Clean layout and reduce condition count. -DF
Flags:	Hide details of this filter from public view Enable this filter Mark as deleted
Filter last modified:	12:20, 10 August 2025 by Sammyrms1 (talk \| contribs)
History:	View this filter's history
Tools:	Export this filter to another wiki {"data":{"rules":"edit_delta \u003C -5000 \u0026\r\nnew_size \u003E= 50 \u0026\r\npage_namespace == 0 \u0026\r\n!(\"confirmed\" in user_groups) \u0026 \r\nlength(summary) \u003C 60 \u0026\r\n!(user_name in page_recent_contributors) \u0026 \r\n!(\"#redirect\" in lcase(added_lines)) \u0026\r\n!(summary irlike \"\\bcop(y\|ied)\|und(id\|o)\|\\brv[vt]?\\b\|revert\|vandal\|remov\|clean\|delet\|\\brmv?\\b\|\\brepea?t\") \u0026\r\nrcount(\"\\n[\|!\u003C]\",removed_lines) / (rcount(\"\\n\",removed_lines) + 1) \u003C 0.9 \u0026\r\nlength(rmwhitespace(added_lines)) \u003C 3000","name":"Large deletion from article by new editors","comments":"Original from Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseFilter/30)\r\n\r\nfixing the part about recent contributor.. \u003Cnixeagle\u003E\r\n\r\nNo, that was the intended logic, to test whether the user is The Only contributor. Putting that back. Deleting from a page you created should be fine, but blanking from an established page just because you edited it previously generally would not be. - Dragons_flight\r\n\r\nRestoring Prodego's edit. - DF\r\nThanks for the talk page note DF / Don't trip if it is a full blank, overlaps with filter 3 -Prodego\r\n\r\nChanged from \"new editor\" to \"non-autoconfirmed editor\" for clarity. -xeno\r\n\r\noptimizing - Hersfold\r\n\r\nI increased the threshold to -2000 to decrease the number of hits - Ruslik0\r\n\r\nFixing the recent contributors thing; this is a string of up to ten users, so != doesn't work. - hersfold\r\n\r\nexception for 69.226.103.13 - Cen\r\n\r\nNO! Do not exempt particular IPs, its a waste of checks. If they want exemption, they can create an account. Its free -Prodego\r\n\r\nIncreased threshold to 5000. - Ruslik\r\nClosed gap between filter 3 and filter 30 - previously could reduce articles to exactly 50 without triggering. RF\r\n\r\nAdded action check, so it'll stop pinging on AFT comments. - rsterbin\r\n\r\nClean layout and reduce condition count. -DF","group":"default","actions":{"tag":["blanking"],"warn":["abusefilter-warning"]},"enabled":true,"deleted":false,"privacylevel":0,"global":false},"actions":{"tag":["blanking"],"warn":["abusefilter-warning"]}}

Actions to take when matched

Trigger actions only if the user trips a rate limit

Number of actions to allow:

Period of time (in seconds):

Group throttle by:

user

See the documentation on mediawiki.org.

Trigger these actions after giving the user a warning

System message to use for warning:

Page name of other message:

(without "MediaWiki:" prefix)

Prevent the user from performing the action in question

System message to use for disallowing:

Page name of other message:

(without "MediaWiki:" prefix)

Revoke the user's autoconfirmed status

Block the user and/or IP address from editing

Block the user and/or IP address from editing their own talk page

Block duration for non-registered users:

Block duration for registered users:

Tag the edit for further review

Tags to apply:

blanking